The Catholic Church for many years in America has enjoyed a strong level of support from the government. However there is an ever increasing number of laws, specifically, with gay-rights, abortion, and same-sex couples adoption that are beginning to sever those ties.
For many Christians and Catholics they are finding themselves in a new place within America, a place where the government is becoming ever more secular. While it has always been true that America has believed in a separation of church and state it is also true that the church strongly influenced the government. The influence was present because the majority held to the beliefs of the church, not because the church had direct governmental power. Within a democracy the beliefs of the individual influence the government and ground the foundation for establishing laws. For this reason it is not a conflict of separation between church and state. The separation of church and state is a direct separation between who exercises the power to establish laws not where the influence of laws comes from.
The struggle now however is Christians are increasingly being forced to accept or condone lifestyles and choices that are in direct conflict to their beliefs. America has increasingly swayed away from valuing one’s religious beliefs towards valuing an increasingly relativist position on the individual rights. The attitude “ if you want to do it and think it’s right who I am I to say otherwise”. The laws are increasingly granting rights for the individual to choose as they please provided those choices do not immediately harm another person’s right to exercise their right to do likewise.
This is exemplified with adoption to same-sex couples. New York Times Article Here Catholic Charities in Illinois, who handled approximately 20% of adoptions in Illinois, decided to close state funded programs rather than be forced to provide adoption services for same-sex couples.
The Catholic Church believes true marriage in a divine spiritual sense cannot exist between any gender beside a man and women. While it is true people in some states have the legal right to marry a person of any gender, that does not change the natural order placed by God as many religions recognize it. It is quite apparent that couples of the same gender cannot naturally create a child. So although we can legally create the freedoms to allow such unions there is some evidence of a natural order to things. It is this natural order that the church is compelled to acknowledge as it is believed and evidenced that some laws are written in our very nature by God. The Church by it’s very essence must first and foremost follow the laws of God, not man.
A quote here from an online forum states in reference to same sex couples adopting: “That is their right to do, obviously it’s not really about the children, but about them wanting to be in control!!! What they wanted is the State Money and the right to still discriminate…….and that isn’t going to happen!!! “ The user when stating “ Them and They is in reference to the church wanting power and money.
There is an ever increasing animosity in the general public toward the church and what the public sees as bigotry or hatred in church teaching. Many of these opinions, though founded on some evidence, are more emotional responses than well researched or well considered points. While there are some founded cases of hatred and bigotry within the church they have often been in direct conflict of the church’s actual teaching and the larger action of the church. While social justice is becoming increasingly popular in secular culture it would be ignorant to not recognize its foundational roots from thousands of years within the Church and biblical teachings. I could belabor the profound evidence of the Church’s history in improving the quality of life and valuing the dignity and respect of the individual though I will leave that to the reader for further research if they so choose. I prefer to address the root.
Both parties, the church and the secular views desire to improve and value the human life. The difference of agreement is the foundation on which to do that. The general public is increasingly respecting the individual and the individual’s right to decide what is morally true. The Church has always held the individual cannot establish moral truth , moral truth is established by God and it is through God’s revelation and then validated in various means to learn the truth. Our secular world is increasingly accepting the notion that created moral truths by man are true, whereas if truth is defined by God then humans defining moral truth are ultimately self deluding. What our culture finds taboo is the authority then given by God through another person to tell another person what they are doing is wrong. I believe this has become taboo because in the past the church has abused this authority and has exercised that power without first loving those they were addressing. Biblical teaching supports this: “If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. “ 1 Corinthians 13:2 In present history the media has likely given a skewed perspective to the average American of the Church and religion in general. It has often given a great emphasis on its faults and glossed over many actual Christian teaching.
Getting back to the quote dealing with Catholic Charities being forced to comply with same-sex couples adopting an interesting point is brought up. Shouldn’t the church do what is in the interest of the children and society by agreeing to comply with state laws? This would allow them to continue to receive state-funding, stay in business and provide services and jobs. All of those things, providing a home for a child and providing financial stability and purposeful work for a person are of great value to the church. However for the church it cannot compromise on what it recognizes as the moral truth as established by God in order to fulfill what is an immediate good. In essence you would be asking the church to undermine the foundation for what empowers them to say we should care for children and provide meaningful employment to workers. The foundational morality as defined by
God.
In the immediate this is difficult to accept. It seems as if believing in God is limiting our capacity to do good because it would mean compromising on what God defines as morality. However it is important to note that if one is to compromise on the foundation that empowers them to do good the long term consequences would be that they ultimately have no foundation and have thus lost a base to expect good from others and potentially from themselves. This seems to be the very thing happening within secular culture, an undermining of any foundation outside of societal expectations of what is good.
Secular culture says we don’t need the foundation we just need the action of good. It is tempting in the immediate because it provides a way for the religious person to provide the services and demonstrate the love that they desire to do so. What is severely lacking however within the secular view is it undermines the power to expect a mutual level of humanity, respect and dignity for human life from each human to each human. To disband the foundation and say “we’re fine so long as action of good takes places” leaves one with nothing left to stand on or to expect action of good from others once actions of good may turn to actions of evil. At that point you will have lost the foundation to hold on to a morality outside of society. In principle it is like saying “is right only right when everyone says it is?”
So while in the religious stance there are moments when it seems the beliefs hold them back from doing what is good, it can actually be empowering for the long term good. Whereas the secular foundation for respecting the individual’s right to choose morality leaves one without a base to expect other humans to treat one another with mutual dignity and respect. There is no authority to correct another morality even if that morality begins to negatively impact the lives of others.








